FEATURES OF SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION OF YOUTH AND ADULTS PERSONALITY IS IN AN INFORMAL SUBCULTURE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series12.2020.10(55).07

Keywords:

socio-psychological adaptation, informal groups, formal groups, informal subculture, personality, youth, adulthood

Abstract

The article presents the results of the study, which allow to expand the scientific vision of adaptation and consider it not only as a process of adaptation to new circumstances, but also as an important process of personal growth and development. The presented study aimed to identify the features of socio-psychological adaptation of adolescents of male and female gender in the informal subculture, compared with respondents who do not belong to it. The research method is a questionnaire of socio-psychological adaptation (SPA) by K. Rogers and R. Diamond. The sample consisted of males and females in adolescence and adulthood. With the help of randomization procedures, two groups of respondents were created, each consisting of 160 individuals representing informal and formal groups, respectively.
The results of studying the integrated socio-psychological adaptation of participants of informal and formal groups and its individual components are revealed. According to the vast majority of components of socio-psychological adaptation, active members of informal groups have higher scores compared to average respondents, in particular, on the scales of “adaptability”, “self-acceptance”, “emotional comfort”, “internal control”, “desire for dominance”. “Conformity”, “escapism”, but lower rates on the scale of “acceptance of others”. The age peculiarities of social and psychological adaptation are empirically determined, namely, the difficulties and advantages of the course of adaptation processes of the representatives of youth and adulthood, which belong / do not belong to informal subcultures. Significantly the most maladaptive are average young men, compared to average adult men (p≤0.05) and informal boys (p≤0.01).In adolescence, the best adaptive properties in the informal subcultural environment were found by the boys, compared to adult men, and in adulthood by women compared to young girls. Gender differentiation of peculiarities of adaptation course in adolescence and adulthood is carried out taking into account the impact on this process of informal subculture. Negative age dynamics of integral adaptation in males, and positive – in females belonging to the informal subculture, were revealed. In general, young men and adult women are more adaptable than young women and adult men. It is proved that active participants of informal groups are socially and psychologically better adapted to these groups, compared to the adaptation of participants of formal groups.

References

  1. Belov, V.I. (2017). Eskapizm: prichinyi, funktsii i granitsyi [Escapism: causes, functions and boundaries]. Mezhdunarodnyiy nauchnyiy zhurnal «Innovatsionnaya nauka» - International Scientific Journal «Innovation Science», 3(1), 270-276. [in Russian].
  2. Golueva, M.M. (2010). Spetsifika negativnogo vliyaniya subkulturyi na razvitie lichnosti podrostka [The specifics of the negative impact of subculture on the development of the personality of a teenager]. Vestnik TGPU - Bulletin of the TSPU, 5(95), 153- [in Russian].
  3. HavrylovskaP. & Furman, O.I. (2016). Osoblyvosti Ya-kontseptsii osib, shcho perebuvaiut u neformalnykh relihiinykh orhanizatsiiakh [Features of self-conception of persons who are in informal religious organizations]. Nauka i osvita - Science and education, 5, 78-83. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2016-5-11 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Zhuravl’ova, L.P., & Kolomiets, T.V. (2013). Strukturno-dynamichna model mizhosobystisnoi vzaiemodii [Structural-dynamicmodel of interpersonal interaction]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Psykholohiia - Bulletin of the Odessa National University. Psychology, 18(2), 17-24. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Zotova,O.I. & Kryazheva, I.K. (2000). Soderzhanie i pokazateli adaptaczii lichnosti [Content and indicators of personality adaptation]. In Vinokurova, V. & Violinist, I.I. (Еds) Organizaczionnaya psikhologiya - Organizational Psychology (рр. 248-256). Sankt-Peterburh : Pуter. [in Russian].
  6. Muzhanova,V. (2016). Vikovi osoblyvosti smyslooi sfery predstavnykiv neformalnykh subkultur [Semantic sphere age features among representatives of informal subcultures]. Nayka i osvita - Science and education, 5, 228-232. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2016-5-37 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Muzhanova,V. (2020). Osobennosti lichnostnoy zrelosti predstaviteley neformal'noy subkul'tury [Features of personal maturity of representatives of the informal subculture]. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, VIII(90), 62-66. [in Russian].
  8. Motkov,O. (2019). Adaptatsiini mekhanizmy osobystosti [Adaptation mechanisms of personality]. Psykholohiia i osobystist - Psychology and personality, 1(15), 22-36. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Osniczkij, A.K. (2004). Opredelenie kharakteristik soczial`noj adaptaczii [Characterization of social adaptation]. Psikhologiya i shkola - Psychology and school, 1, 43-56. [in Russian].
  10. Popovich,V. (2013). Sutnist i zmist adaptatsii: filosofskyi analiz [The essence and content of adaptation: a philosophical analysis]. Humanitarian Bulletin of ZDIA - Humanitarnyi visnyk ZDIA, 56, 228-239. [in Ukrainian].
  11. Yarovenko,A. (2010). «Begstvo ot realnosti»: automifologizatsiya kak garmonizatsiya «Ya-byitiya» cherez prinyatie illyuzii [“Escape from reality”: automythologization as a harmonization of “I-being” through the adoption of illusion]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta - Bulletin of the Tambov University, 331, 50-55. [in Russian].
  12. Dunlap,, Golub, A., Johnson, B.D., & Wesley, D. (2002). Intergenerational transmission of conduct norms for drugs, sexual exploitation and violence: a case study. British Journal of Criminology, 2, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.1.1
  13. Feng,Yingjuan. (2009). Composition of Regional Advanced Culture Forces and Its Implement Approaches. Asian Social Science, 5, 38-43.
  14. Hogg, M. & Ridgeway, C. (2003). “Social Identity: Sociological and Social Psychological Perspectives”. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 97-100. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1519841
  15. Paterline, & Orr, D. (2016). Adaptation to Prison and Inmate Self-Concept. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 4, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.15640/jpbs.v4n2a6
  16. Zhang,Nan. (2009). On Assortment and Implementation of Modern Mass Customization of Apparel. Asian Social Science, 5, 72-77. https://doi.org/5539/ass.v5n2p72

Published

2020-07-06