PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES OF THE INTERPERSONAL INTERACTION IN ADOLESCENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series12.2020.9(54).05

Keywords:

adolescence, affectation of the interpersonal interaction, dominance, contact, interpersonal interaction.

Abstract

The aim of the research is to investigate the psychological characteristics of youth’s behavior in the context of interpersonal interaction. Theoretical, empirical and statistical methods have been applied for the realization of the research tasks. The main results of empirical research of behavioral activity, affectation and manifestations of youth’s dominance in the situation of interpersonal interaction are presented in the article. Their age, gender and dynamic characteristics have been analyzed. As a result of the empirical research,it was defined that the most of modern youth does not show a great interest in establishing interpersonal contacts. Age dynamics of interpersonal interaction was found and its gender characteristics were analyzed. The period from the teen-age to adulthood there is a decrease in the level of social contacting of young people. This dynamics is typical for boys more than girls. It is stated that a higher level of the interpersonal activity is peculiar for young boysin the аdolescence. As for young girls, they are more active in the adulthood.It is noted that young people of the аdolescence expresstheir emotions in the process of interpersonal interaction differently: frompathological emotionality tocomplete indifference. The tendency of increasing pathological indicators of emotionality in the interaction during the period of adulthood is analyzed. This dynamics is more common for male representatives compared to females. The empirical study proves that there is an adequate level of emotional activity for boys, and for young girls it is high. It is established thatthemajority of modern youth tends to satisfy their own need of dominance in the process of the interaction with others. Іn the early adolescence characteristics of dominant behavior are much more frequent than in the late one, and boys are inferior to girls in the level of dominance.

References

  1. Ináncsi, T., Láng, A., & Bereczkei, T. (2015). Machiavellianism and adult attachment in general interpersonal relationships and close relationships. Europe’s journal of psychology, 11(1), 139.
  2. Huang, S.C., Broniarczyk, S.M., Zhang, Y., & Beruchashvili, M. (2015). From close to distant: The dynamics of interpersonal relationships in shared goal pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1252-1266.
  3. Le, B.M., Impett, E.A., Lemay Jr, E.P., Muise, A., & Tskhay, K.O. (2018). Communal motivation and well-being in interpersonal relationships: An integrative review and meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 144(1), 1.
  4. Pietrulewicz, B., & Zhuravlova, L. (2016). Significance of relationships and psychosocial adaptation during adolescence. Science and Education, 5, 7-29. Retrieved from https://scienceandeducation.pdpu.edu.ua/uk/articles/2016-5-doc/2016-5-st3
  5. Poteat, V.P., Mereish, E.H., & Birkett,M. (2015). The negative effects of prejudice on interpersonal relationships within adolescent peer groups. Developmental psychology, 51(4), 544.
  6. Orehek, E., Forest, A.L., & Barbaro, N. (2018). A people-as-means approach to interpersonal relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(3), 373-389.
  7. Verny, T.R., & Kelly, J. (1988). The secret life of the unborn child. Dell, 253.
  8. Bekh,D. (2008) Vykhovannia osobystosti [Personal education]. Kуiv : Lybid [in Ukrainian].
  9. Bekh,D. (1998) Osobystisno zoriientovane vykhovannia [Personally oriented education]. Kуiv : IZMN [in Ukrainian].
  10. Bozhovich,I. (1968). Lichnost' i ee formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its formation in childhood]. Moscow : Prosveshhenie [in Russian].
  11. Borishevs'kij, M.J. (Еd.). (2006). Psihologіchnі zakonomіrnostі rozvitku gromadyans'koї spryamovanostі osobistostі: monografіya [Psychological patterns of development of civic orientation of the individual: a monograph]. Kуiv : Mіlenіum [in Ukrainian].
  12. Budur, I.M. (2009). Problema formuvannia zghurtovanosti v psykholohii. Naukovi zapysky Kharkivskoho universytetu povitrianykh syl. Sotsialna. filosofiia, psykholohiia − Scientific notes of Kharkiv Air Force University. Social philosophy, psychology, 2 (33), 214- [in Ukrainian].
  13. Sgurskaja, L.V., & Tamarskij, G.S. (2003). Diagnostika mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenij podrostkov i starsheklassnikov: Metodicheskie rekomendacii [Diagnosis of interpersonal relationships of adolescents and high school students: Guidelines]. Kaliningrad : Izd-vo KGU [in Russian].
  14. Kon, I.S. (1979). Psihologija junosheskogo vozrasta: (Problemy formirovanija lichnosti) [Psychology of adolescence: (Problems of personality formation]. Moscow : Prosveshhenie [in Russian].
  15. Kulagina, I. Ju., & Koljuckij, V. N. (2001). Vozrastnaja psihologija: polnyj zhiznennyj cikl razvitija cheloveka: uchebnoe posobie dlja studentov vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij [Age psychology: the complete life cycle of human development]. Moscow : TC «Sfera» [in Russian].
  16. Massanov,V. (2009). Psihologіchnij suprovіd udoskonalennja osobistostі majbutnіh fahіvcіv [Psychological support for improving the personality of future professionals]. Nauka і osvіta − Science and Education, № 5, 94-98 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Muhina,S. (1999). Vozrastnaja psihologija: fenomenologija razvitija, detstvo, otrochestvo: uchebnik dlja stud. vuzov [Age psychology: phenomenology of development, childhood, adolescence: textbook for university students]. Moscow : Izdatel'skij centr «Akademija» [in Russian].
  18. Pylypenko,I. (2011). Samovyznachennia osobystosti v mizhosobystisnykh vzaiemynakh yak faktor rozvytku yii dukhovnosti [Self-determination of personality in interpersonal relationships as a factor in the development of its spirituality]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka Natsionalnoi APN Ukrainy − Proceedings of the GS Psychology Institute Kostyuk of the National APS of Ukraine, T.XIII, 4, 267-274 [in Ukrainian].
  19. Samoukina, (2000). Simbioticheskie aspekty otnoshenij mezhdu mater’ju i rebenkom [Symbiotic aspects of mother-child relationships.]. Voprosy psihologii − Psychology issues, №3, 67-81 [in Russian].
  20. Shirshova, I.A. (1996). Razvitie gumanisticheskih ubezhdenij starsheklassnikov v mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenijah [Development of humanistic beliefs of high school students in interpersonal relations]. Candidate’s thesis. Moscow [in Russian].

Downloads

Published

2020-02-27