DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNAL RESOURCES OF PERSONALITY AS A CONDITION FOR OVERCOMING CRISIS STATES IN ADULT

Abstract

The article analyzes the approaches to strategies for overcoming psycho-emotional traumatization of the individual through the use of the individual's own resources and its usual ways of self-regulation in different modalities, the so-called resource models. In particular, the described research methodology is an integrative model of overcoming the crisis of BASIC PH. The obtained results of the research allow to expand the scientific understanding of the processes of using the internal resource of a person who got into difficult life circumstances, was subjected to emotional trauma. It is substantiated that it is expedient to consider the use of internal resources not only as a strategy to overcome trauma due to previous personal experience but also as a possible process of development and personal growth. The study aimed to identify the main factors and features of the manifestation of psycho-traumatization of the adult personality. Research method - methodology BASIC PH (Lahad M. & Shacham M. & Ayalon, 2013) and the method “Scale of reactive and personal anxiety (STAI)” (development: C.D.Spielberger, R.L. Gorsuch, R.E. Lushene, USA; adaptation: Y. L. Khanin).
It has been proven that in order to overcome emotional trauma, the dominant ways of using the inner resource in adults were appeals to the mind (thinking) and faith, as well as reducing stress through physical activity. Instead, less often in crisis situations, respondents focused on their own emotions and feelings or sought help from others or connected their own imagination. It is empirically revealed that there is a relationship between the age of the subject and the choice of factors and features of overcoming the trauma of personality. The older a person is, the more often he hopes for God's help, more actively turns to prayer, spiritual practices, etc. It is confirmed that over the years the subjects begin to think more and analyze complex circumstances, as well as pay less attention to their own experiences. It has been found that there is a direct relationship between levels of anxiety and the use of emotional response, imagination and the ability to turn to others for help to overcome life's difficulties. The lower the level of situational and personal anxiety, the more often a person in crisis situations can: react emotionally and show feelings; use creativity, imagination; shares their own problems with others, seek help. At the same time, the study found that the use of faith and reason as ways to reduce emotional stress, on the contrary, are used by people with elevated levels of personal anxiety and situational anxiety.

References

1. Ananev, B.H. (2016). Chelovek kak predmet poznanyia [Human as an object of knowledge]. Sankt-Peterburh : Pyter. [in Russian].
2. Antsyferova, L.Y. (1994). Lychnost v trudnykh zhyznennukh uslovyiakh: pereosmuslyvanye, preobrazovanye sytuatsyi y psykholohycheskaia zashchyta [Personality in difficult living conditions: rethinking, transformation of situations and psychological protection]. Psykholohycheskyi zhurnal, 15(1), 3-18. [in Russian].
3. Bodrov, V.A. (1996). Kohnytyvnue protsessu y psykholohycheskyi stress [Cognitive processes and psychological stress]. Psykholohycheskyi zhurnal, 2(4), 64-74. [in Russian].
4. Breusenko-Kuznetsov, A.A. (2008). Teoryy lychnosty: zarubezhnui oput teoretyzatsyy: Kurs lektsyi [Personality theories: foreign experience of theorizing: Course of lectures]. Kyiv : Myllenyum, 442 [in Ukrainian].
5. Vasyliuk, F.E. (1984). Psykholohyia perezhyvanyia (analyz preodolenyia krytycheskykh sytuatsyi) [Psychology of experience (analysis of overcoming critical situations)]. Moskva : Yzd-vo Mosk. un-ta. [in Russian].
6. Vdovychenko, A.V. (2013). Osoblyvosti kopinh-povedinky osobystosti u zhyttievykh ta profesiinykh sytuatsiiakh [Features of coping behavior of an individual in life and professional situations]. Visnyk Chernihivskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu. Seriia Psykholohichni nauky, 114, 17-20. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VchdpuPH_20
   13_114_6. [in Ukrainian].
7. Honcharov, M.S. (2008). Perezhyvanye kak realyzatsyia (yly proiavlenye) subektyvnosty y stress kak neyzbezhnost stanovlenyia y funktsyonyrovanyia cheloveka [Experience as the realization (or manifestation) of subjectivity and stress as the inevitability of human formation and functioning]. Myr psykholohyy, 4, 3-7. [in Russian].
8. Karpovych, E. (2014). Mnohomernaia model BASIC Ph v psykholohycheskoi praktyke [Multidimensional BASIC Ph model in psychological practice]. Retrieved from: https://www.b17.ru/article/16382/ [in Russian].
9. Kerdyvar, V.V. (2019). Pohlyblenyi psykholohichnyi analiz vrazlyvykh katehorii vnutrishno peremishchenykh osib [In-depth psychological analysis of vulnerable categories of internally displaced persons]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Psykholohichni nauky», 1, 217-222. [in Ukrainian].
10. Kriukova, T.L. (2005). Vozrastnue y krosskulturnгe razlychyia v stratehyiakh sovladaiushcheho povedenyia [Age and cross-cultural differences in coping strategies]. Psykholohycheskyi zhurnal, 26(2), 5-15. [in Russian].
11. Lazarus, A., Zeih, D.K. & Miunyon, V.M. (2000). Multymodalnaia psykhoterapyia [Multimodal psychotherapy]. Psykhoterapyia – chto эto? Moskva : NF Klass, 228-232. [in Russian].
12. Leontev, D.A. (2007). Psykholohyia smusla: pryroda, stroenye y dynamyka smuslovoi realnosty [Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality]. Moskva : Smusl. [in Russian].
13. Maklakov, A.H. (2001). Lychnostnyi adaptatsyonnyi potentsyal: eho mobylyzatsyia y prohnozyrovanye v ekstremalnukh uslovyiakh [Personal adaptation potential: its mobilization and forecasting in extreme conditions]. Psykholohycheskyi zhurnal, 22(1), 16-24. [in Russian].
14. Mey, R., Maslou, A., Rodzhers, K., Ollport, H. & Laions, Dzh. (2017). Teoryia y praktyka ekzytsentsyalnli psykholohyy [Theory and practice of existential psychology]. Moskva : Ynstytut Obshchehumanytarnukh Yssledovanyi, 336. [in Russian].
15. Nartova-Bochaver, S.K. (1997). «Coping-behavior» v systeme poniatyi psykholohyy lychnosty [«Coping-behavior» in the system of concepts of personality psychology]. Psykholohycheskyi zhurnal, 18(5), 20-30. [in Russian].
16. Osnovnue napravlenyia sovremennoi psykhoterapyy [The main directions of modern psychotherapy] (2000). Moskva : «Kohyto-Tsentr», 379. [in Russian].
17. Panasenko, N.M., & Voitovych, M.V. (2016). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti podolannia osobystistiu zhyttievykh kryz [Psychological features of overcoming life crises]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii. Psykhofiziolohiia. Psykholohiia pratsi. Eksperymentalna psykholohiia, 5(16), 126-135 Retrieved from: http://www.appsychology.org.ua/data/jrn/v5/i16/16.pdf [in Ukrainian].
18. Polskaia, N.A. (2007). Vzaymosviaz sklonnosty k modyfykatsyiam tela s kopynh-stratehyiamy [Іnterrelation of between propensity for body modifications and coping strategies]. Voprosu psykholohyy, 6, 43-54. [in Russian].
19. Rubynshtein, S.L. (2012). Butye y soznanye [Being and consciousness]. Sankt-Peterburh : Pyter. [in Russian].
20. Tedeshchi, R.H., & Kalkhun, L.H. (2004). Posttravmatychne zrostannia: kontseptualni zasady ta empirychni dokazy [Post-traumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence]. Psykholohichne rozsliduvannia, 15, 1–21. [in Ukrainian].
21. Tytarenko, T.M. (2018). Zhyttia yak budivelnyi maidanchyk: osobysti naslidky posttravmatychnoho dosvidu [Life as a construction site: personal consequences of post-traumatic experience]. Psykholohichna dopomoha osobystosti v skladnykh obstavynakh zhyttiediialnosti: zbirnyk dopovidei vseukrainskoho nauk.-prakt. Seminaru. Chernivtsi : ChNU im. Yu. Fedkovycha, 6-9. [in Ukrainian].
22. Uvarova, S.H., Boichenko, N.H., Hryshkan, S.O., & Ulko, N.M. (2016). Robochi modeli i tekhniky vidnovlennia / adaptatsii [Working models and techniques of restoration / adaptation]. Psykholohichna dopomoha v kryzovykh sytuatsiiakh. Kyiv : PVNZ MIHP, 52-64 [in Ukrainian].
23. Frankl, V. (2012). Psykhoterapyia na praktyke. Psykhoterapyia y ekzystentsyalyzm: yzbrannue rabotu po lohoterapyy [Psychotherapy in practice. Psychotherapy and existentialism: selected works on logotherapy]. Luhansk : Byh-Press, 312. [in Ukrainian].
24. Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science Medicine, 36, 725–733.
25. Lahad, M., Shacham, M., & Ayalon, O. (2013). The «BASIC Ph» Model of Coping and Resiliency Theory, Research and Cross-Cultural. London, UK and Philadelphia, USA: Jessica Kingsley.
26. Leykin, D. (2013). Measuring BASIC Ph. The «BASIC Ph» Model of Coping and Resiliency Theory, Research and Cross-Cultural. London, UK and Philadelphia, USA : Jessica Kingsley, 33-48.
27. Lazarus, A.A., & Hautzinger, M. (1996). Multimodale Therapieplanung (BASIC-ID). Verhaltenstherapie: Techniken, Einzelverfahren und Behandlungsanleitungen. Berlin: Springer, 47-51.
28. Maddi, S.R., & Khoshaba, D.M. (1994). Hardiness and mental health. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 265-274.
29. Persaud, Raj (1998). Staying Sane: How to Make Your Mind Work for You. London: Metro Books.
30. Tedeschi, R.G., & Calhoun, L.G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 1–18.