ВПЛИВ НЕЙРОПЛАСТИЧНОСТІ НЕРВОВОЇ СИСТЕМИ НА РОЗВИТОК ОСОБИСТОСТІ У ПІДЛІТКОВОМУ ВІЦІ

Abstract

The modern approach to adolescent education is a consequence of our misunderstanding, insecurity and contradictions: we equally exaggerate the degree of personal maturity of adolescents, then we underestimate it. In our society 20-year-old people who have committed a crime are judged to the fullest extent oh the law, because they are old enough to take responsibility for their actions. At the same time, there is a ban on the sale of alcoholic beverages to people under the age of 21, because their body is not yet mature. As a result, society has no understanding, how to treat people of this age category. We need to rethink our attitude towards adolescence. Fortunately, over the past decades, there has been a significant increase in scientific interest in the study of adolescence. The aim of the article is to describe the results of theoretical analysis of scientific research on the impact of neuroplasticity of the nervous system on the formation of personality in adolescence. The aim of the article is a theoretical analysis of scientific research on the influence of neuroplasticity of the nervous system on the formation of personality in adolescence. The objectives of the study were: to identify the psychological characteristics of personality development in adolescence; in the analysis of psychophysiological features of the development of a nervous system of teenagers; in determining the role of neuroplasticity of the nervous system in the personal development of adolescents. The article combines the experience of scientists who study the adolescence. Overall result adolescence as a stage in life requires a radical revision of the methods of education of modern adolescence, their teaching and society`s attitude towards them. It was revealed a tendency towards an increase in the number of studies of psychological and pedagogical methods do not work and how it is necessary to change the practical work of a psychologist with modern adolescence is relevant in order to achieve an effect. The conducted theoretical analysis of the latest scientific data will draw attention to the specifics of the development of the brain during adolescence.  Knowledge about this will allow choosing the most optimal ways of interacting with adolescence and facilitate their experience of a difficult an emotionally  intense life stage.

References

1. Bulakh, I.S. (2003). Psykholohiia osobystisnoho zrostannia pidlitka [Psychology of personal growth of the teenager]: Monohrafiia. Kyiv : NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova [in Ukrainian].
2. Bushai, I.M. (2000). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti rozvytku «Ia-obrazu» aktsentuiovanykh pidlitkiv [Psychological features of the development of "I-image" of accentuated adolescents]. Tvorcha spadshchyna H.S.Kostiuka ta suchasna psykholohiia. Do 100-richchia vid dnia narodzhennia akademika H.S.Kostiuka. Materialy III zizdu Tovarystva psykholohiv Ukrainy. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
3. Gurjewa, W.A. (2007) Klinicheskayaa i sudebnaya podrodtkowaya psihiatriya. [Clinical and forensicadolescent psychiatry] Moskwa : Medizinskoye informazionnoye agenstwo [in Russian].
4. Dammann, G., & Polishchuk, V. (2020). Malenkyi prynts – samohubstvo sered pidlitkiv [The Little Prince is a suicide among teenagers.]. Psykhosomatychna medytsyna ta zahalna praktyka 5, 2. Kyiv : Natsionalnyi medychnyi universytet imeni O.O. Bohomoltsia. Rezhym dostupu: https://uk.e-medjournal.com/index.php/psp/article/view/240#author-2 [in Ukrainian].
5. Dzhensen, Francis E. (2019). Mozg podrostka [Teen brain]. Moskwa : Bombora [in Russian].
6. Kyrychenko, T.V. (2001). Psykholohichni mekhanizmy samorehuliatsii povedinky pidlitkiv [Psychological mechanisms of self-regulation of adolescent behavior] (avtoref. dys. kand. psykhol. nauk). Kyiv : Nats. ped. un-t im. M.P.Drahomanova [in Ukrainian].
7. Luriya, A.R. (2019). Vysshyie korkovyie funktsii cheloveka [Higher cortical functionsof a person]. Sankt-Peterburg : Piter [in Russian].
8. Nakazawa, Donna Djekson. (2020). Oskolki detskih trawm [Fragments of childhood trauma]. Moskwa : Bombora [in Russian].
9. Rean, A.A. (2003). Psikhologiya podrostka. Polnoe rukovodstvo [Adolescent psychology. Complete guide]. Sankt-Peterburg : Prajm-EVROZNAK [in Russian].
10. Rodgers, K. (2017). Stanovlenie lichnosti. Wzglyad na psichoterapiyu. [Personality formation]. Moskwa: IOI [in Russian].
11. Svaab, D.F. (2019). Nash tvorchyi mozok [Our creative brain]. Kharkiv : Klub Simeinoho Dozvillia. [in Ukrainian].
12. Steinberg, Laurence. (2017). Perehodnyj wozrast [Transitional age]. Moskwa : Mann. Iwanow and Feber [in Russian].
13. Tokareva, N.M., Shamne, A.V., & Makarenko, N.M. (2014). Suchasnyi pidlitok u systemi psykholoho-pedahohichnoho suprovodu [The modern teenager in the system of psychological and pedagogical support]: Kryvyi Rih [in Ukrainian].
14. Faber, A., & Mazlish, E. (2016). Kak goworit`, chtoby podrostki clushali [How to talk so that teenagers listen]. Moskwa [in Russian].
15. Fopel, K. (2008). Na poroge wzrosloj zhizni. Planirowaniye zhizni. Resheniye problem. Sotrudnichestwo [On the verge of adulthood]. Moskwa : Genesis [in Russian].
16. Homskaja, E.D. (2019). Neuropsihologiya: uchebnik dlya wyzow. [Neuropsychology]. Sankt-Peterburg : Piter [in Russian].