REASONABLENESS IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE INDIVIDUAL’S DETERMINATION

Abstract

The aim of this research is to present the results of the analysis of reasonableness in the structure of determination, the psychological features of determination as a sustainable integral property of the individual. The goal was achieved by the following research objectives: the study of the psychological characteristics of personality intelligence as characteristics of determination; the explore of the relationships between the determination and rationality of personality choices; the identification of the persons with a dominant rationality; the explore of the sustainable characteristics of determination in individuals who are rational. The relevance of the study is due to the need for science to be methodologically generalized in the problem of rationality, in the methodical development of reasonableness as a characteristic of determination, and in the development of applied aspects of using sets of indicators, functional blocks and individual psychological features of individual determination.
The results of the analysis of the relationship between rationality and personality selection and decision-making were presented. The modern ideas of usefulness, prudence, rationality in decision-making by personality according to the data of foreign and domestic studies were described. A set of diagnostic techniques to solve the research problems of studying the rationality of determination and rationality of personality selection was designed: «Selfassessment of the structure of determination», «Personality Decision Factors», «Personality Type Indicator», and also «The Melbourne Decision Survey».
The results of the correlational analysis of the correlations of the indicators of determination, reasonable decision-making and personality rationality were presented. The positive, significant relationships between rationality, cognitive determination, alertness, sensory and crucial personality type were identified. The study also revealed negative significant relationships between rationality, adventurism, spontaneity, risk preparedness and personality type indicators – extroversion and perceiving type. The profiles of the characteristics of determination, and the psychological characteristics of choice in persons who are rational were reviewed. The components of the structure of subjective and functional utility of decision making by personality were highlighted.

References

1. Vyatkin, A.P. (2012). Sub'ektivnaya ekonomicheskaya ratsionalnost: teoreticheskiy ekskurs [Subjective economic rationality: a theoretical digression]. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Psihologiya» – News of Irkutsk State University. Series «Psychology», 1, 2, 36-46. Retrieved from http://izvestiapsy.isu.ru/ru/article/file?id=512 [in Russian].
2. Efremova, T.F. (2000). Novyiy slovar russkogo yazyika. Tolkovo-obrazovatelnyiy [The new dictionary of the Russian language. Intelligent and educational]. Moskva : Russkiy yazyik; v 2 t. Retrieved from http://www.read.in.ua/book189442 [in Russian].
3. Indina, T.A. (2007). Regulyatornyie i lichnostnyie determinantyi prinyatiya resheniy (na materiale politicheskogo golosovaniya) [Regulatory and personality determinants of decision making (based on political voting)]. Candidate`s thesis. Moskva. Retrieved from https://dlib.rsl.ru/viewer/01003052444#?page=1 [in Russian].
4. Kalin,K. (2001). Psihologiya voli [Psychology of the will]; N.F. Kalina (Scientific ed.). Simferopol [in Russian].
5. Kaneman, D. (2006). Kartyi ogranichennoy ratsionalnosti: psihologiya dlya povedencheskoy ekonomiki [Maps of Limited Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics]. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 2, 5-28. Retrieved from https://studall.org/all-168022.html [in Russian].
6. Karpov,V., & Skityaeva V.M. (2005). Psihologiya metakognitivnyih protsessov lichnosti [Psychology of metacognitive processes of personality]. Moskva: Izdatelstvo «Institut psihologii RAN». Retrieved from http://padaread.com/?book=17367 [in Russian].
7. Kornilova, T.V. (2014). Risk i prinyatie resheniy: psihologiya neopredelennosti [Risk and decision making: the psychology of uncertainty]. Electronic edition of the project RHF. Retrieved from URL: rfh.ru/downloads/Books/144693004 [in Russian].
8. Kornilova, T.V., Stepanosova, O.V., & Grigorenko E.L. (2006). Intuitsiya i ratsionalnost v urovnevoy regulyatsii verbalnyih prognozov pri prinyatii resheniy [Intuition and rationality in the level regulation of verbal predictions when making decisions]. Voprosyi psihologii – Psychology Issues, 2, 126-137. Retrieved from http://www.vash-psiholog.info/voprospsih/215/17919-intuiciya-i-racionalnost-v-urovnevoj-regulyacii-verbalnyx-prognozov-pri-prinyatii-reshenij.html [in Russian].
9. Morosanova, V.I., & Indina, T.A. (2011). Regulyatornyie i lichnostnyie osnovyi prinyatiya resheniy [Regulatory and personal decision making]. SPb.; Moskva : Nestor-Istoriya. Retrieved from https://nestorbook.ru/uCat/item/360 [in Russian].
10. Pisotskyi, O.P. (2008). Kohnityvnyi styl yak chynnyk rozvytku intelektualnoho potentsialu maibutnoho praktychnoho psykholoha [Cognitive style as a factor in the development of the intellectual potential of the future practical psychologist]. Candidate`s thesis. Retrieved fromhttp://www.disslib.org/kohnityvnyi-styl-jak-chynnyk-rozvytku-intelektualnoho-potentsialu-majbutnoho.html [in Ukrainian].
11. Pomytkina, L.V. (2013). Psykholohiia pryiniattia osobystistiu stratehichnykh zhyttievykh rishen [Psychology of making personal strategic decisions]. Kyiv : Kafedra. Retrieved from http://er.nau.edu.ua/handle/NAU/31523 [in Ukrainian].
12. Sannikov, A. (2015). Psikhologiia zhiznennogo vybora lichnosti [Psychology of life choice of a person]. Odessa: Izd-vo VMV [in Russian].
13. Sannikov, A.I. (2017). Sootnoshenie ratsionalnosti i emotsionalnosti: regulyatsiya zhiznennogo vyibora lichnosti [Correlation of rationality and emotionality: regulation of a person’s life choice]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Psykholohiia – Bulletin of the Odessa National University. Psychology. 22, 1 (43), 77-89. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vonu_psi_2017_22_1_12 [in Russian].
14. Sannykova, O.P. (2009). Determynatsyonnye tendentsyy emotsyonalnosty [Deterministic tendencies of emotionality]. Naukovyi chasopys NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova – Scientific journal of MP Dragomanov NPU. Seriia № 12. Psykholohichni nauky: Zb. nauk. prats, 26 (50), І, 426, 114-123 [in Russian].
15. Sannikova, O.P. (1995). Emotsionalnost v strukture lichnosti [Emotionality in the structure of personality]. Odessa : Khors [in Russian].
16. Sannikov, O.I. (2017). Vid styliu pryiniattia rishen do stylovykh kharakterystyk osobystosti: geneza uiavlen [From decision-making style to personality style characteristics: Genesis of ideas]. Visnyk pisliadyplomnoi osvity – Bulletin of postgraduate education, 3(32), 98-115. Retrieved from http://umo.edu.ua/images/content
    /nashi_vydanya/visnyk_PO/3_31_2017/social/%D0%A1%D0%90%D0%9D%
    D0%9D%D0%98%D0%9A%D0%9E%D0%922.pdf [in Ukrainian].
17. Sannikova, O.P., & Sannikov, O.I. (2018). Avantiurnist i ryzyk u strukturi pryiniattia rishen [Adventure and risk in the decision-making structure]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 9-10/CLXXIV-CLXXV, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-9-10-16 [in Ukrainian].
18. Serbin-Zherdetska, I.A. (2014). Zhyttievyi vybir osobystosti ta yoho skladovi komponenty [Life Choice of Personality and its Components]. Visnyk ONU im. I. I. Mechnykova - Bulletin of ONU them. II Mechnikov. Psychology, 19, 3 (33), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.18524/2304-1609.2014.3(33).135240 [in Ukrainian].
19. Chernobrovkin, V.M. (2010). Psykholohiia pryiniattia pedahohichnykh rishen [Psychology of pedagogical decision making]. Luhansk : Vydavnytstvo DZ «LNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka». Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/ bitstream/123456789/1587/3/Chernobrovkin.pdf [in Ukrainian].
20. Sannikova, O.P. (2015). Continuality principle in the structure of personality characteristics. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, IІI (21), 43, 62-66. Retrieved from https://www.seanewdim.com/ uploads/3/4/5/1/34511564/ped_psy_iii21_
    issue_43.pdf