PRONATAL ATTITUDES OF YOUTH AS MANIFESTATION OF UKRAINIAN MENTALITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/UDU-nc.series12.2024.23(68).05

Keywords:

pronatal attitudes, reproductive attitudes, values, mentality, genophilia, genophobia.

Abstract

The article highlights the peculiarities of pronatal attitudes of Ukrainian youth (in particular, the phenomenon of unplanned pregnancy), which are formed under the influence of culture and mentality. University students from the western regions of Ukraine and Belarus participated in the study. Despite the historically formed stable family- and child-oriented attitudes among those populations, significant changes in the institutional structure of both the countries and the transformation of the socio-cultural background of young people’s life style caused the changes in the pronatal behavior of women. The results obtained indicate the slight differences in the emotional response among the respondents of both subgroups to the fact of an unplanned pregnancy. The dominance of negative emotions (fear, shock, despair) expresses the psycho-traumatic nature of the situation and the need for further existential choice. We found statistically significant differences only for the emotions “joy”, “anxiety” and “panic”. It is worth highlighting the greater level of readiness of Ukrainian women to give birth to a child in comparison with the Belarusian ones (83.7% and 52.3%, respectively), whereas the medical termination of pregnancy was preferred by 16.3% of Ukrainian women and 47.7% of Belarusian women. In addition, certain differences were also found in the ranking of values related to pronatal attitudes. Ukrainian respondents can be characterized as family- and child-oriented. Among six life-determining values, the leading positions were taken by “family”, “love” and “children”, whereas for representatives of the Belarusian sample, the most prioritized values were “love” and “personal freedom”. The results obtained also indicate statistically significant differences between the samples both in terms of the level of manifestation of the general reproductive attitude and its components – genophilia/genophobia and reproductive activity/passivity. We found that Belarusian respondents were more prone to genophobia and reproductive passivity.

References

  1. Aksonova, S. (2016). Pidlitkove materynstvo: demohrafichnyi aspekt problemy. [Adolescent motherhood: the demographic aspect of the problem]. Kyiv : In-t demohrafii ta sotsialnykh doslidzhen imeni M.V. Ptukhy NAN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian]
  2. Alieksieienko, T.F. (2017). Kontseptualizatsiia sotsialno-pedahohichnykh osnov suchasnoho simeinoho vykhovannia [Conceptualization of socio-pedagogical foundations of modern family education]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  3. Ancheva, I.A. (2017). Suchasnyi pohliad na psykholohichnu hotovnist zhinky do materynstva [Modern view of the psychological woman’s readyness to maternity]. Zdorove zhenshchyny Women's Health, 6(122), 50–52. Retrieved from: https://repo.odmu.edu.ua/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/4617/Ancheva.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [in Ukrainian].
  4. Aslanian, T.S., & Sheveldina O.V. (2018) Psykholohichni osoblyvosti seksualnoi povedinky suchasnykh zhinok [Psychological features of the sexual behavior of modern women]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University, 3, 13–17. Retrieved from: https://pj.journal.kspu.edu/index.php/pj/article/view/316/293 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (2020). Dity, zhinky ta simia v Ukraini: Statystychnyi zbirnyk. [Children, women and families in Ukraine: Statistical collection]. Retrieved from: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2020/zb/09/DJS_2019_pdf.pdf [in Ukrainian]
  6. Dutko, A.A., & Zabolotna, M.R. (2016). Reproduktyvnыe prava fyzycheskoho lytsa: sushchnost, poniatye y klassyfykatsyia [Reproductive rights of an individual: essence, concept and classification]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu vnutrishnikh sprav – Scientific Bulletin of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, 3, 82–90. Retrieved from: https://dspace.lvduvs.edu.ua/bitstream/1234567890/1753/1/%D0%94%D1%83%D1%82%D0%BA%D0%BE.pdf  [in Russian].
  7. Korchakova, N., & Bezliudnaia, V. (2021). Ustanovky studencheskoi molodezhy otnosytelno nezaplanyrovannoi beremennosty [Students' attitudes regarding unplanned pregnancy]. Psykholohiia: realnist i perspektyvy – Psychology reality and prospects, 16, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.35619/praprv.v1i16.207 [in Russian].
  8. Kurylo, Y.O., Aksenova, S.Yu., & Sliusar, L.Y. (2017). Brachnost, rozhdaemost i vosproyzvodstvo materinskoho pokolenyia v Belorusy i Ukrayne: opyt sravnytelnoho analyza [Marriage and birth rate and maternal reproduction in Belarus and Ukraine: experience of comparative analysis]. Demohrafiia ta sotsialna ekonomika – Demography and Social Economy, 2(30), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2010.02.064 [in Russian].
  9. Levchuk, N.M., & Perelli-Kharris B. (2010). Aborty ta narodzhuvanist v Ukraini. «Konkurentsiia» prodovzhuietsia? [Abortion and birth in Ukraine. Will “competition” continue?]. Demohrafiia ta sotsialna ekonomika - Demography and Social Economy, 2(14), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse02.064 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Martyniuk, I.S. (2020). Sotsialno-psykholohichni determinanty samootsinky vahitnykh zhinok. Psykholohichnyi chasopys – Psychological journal, 6(10), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.31108/1.2020.6.10 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Perepeliuk, T.D. (2023). Aborty – psykholohichnyi stan zhinky ta vplyv na nastupnu vahitnist [Abortion is a psychological factor for a woman and contributes to the onset of pregnancy]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: PsykholohiiaScientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Series: Psychology, 3, 59–62. https://doi.org/10.32782/psy-visnyk/2023.3.11 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Romanenko T.H., Morozova O.V. (2022). Suchasnyi pohliad na pereryvannia nebazhanoi vahitnosti nekhirurhichnym metodom [A modern view on the termination of an unwanted pregnancy by a non-surgical method]. Reproduktyvne zdorovia zhinky – Women's Reproductive Health, 1, 8–12. https://doi.org/10.30841/2708-8731.1.2022.258129 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Slabkyi H.O., Haborovets Yu.Yu., Dudyna O.O. (2016). Analiz rezultatyvnosti rehionalnoi perynatalnoi dopomohy zhinkam v Ukraini [Analysis of the effectiveness of regional perinatal care for women in Ukraine]. Visnyk sotsialnoi hihiieny ta orhanizatsii okhorony zdorovia Ukrainy – Bulletin of social hygiene and health care organizations of Ukraine, 4(70), 4–11. https://doi.org/11603/1681-2786.2016.4.7542 [in Ukrainian].
  14. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy (2020). Sotsialno-demohrafichni kharakterystyky domohospodarstv Ukrainy u 2020 rotsi (za danymy vybirkovoho obstezhennia umov zhyttia domohospodarstv) [Socioal and demographic characteristics of the households of Ukraine in 2020 (according to the data of the selective observation of living condition of the households]. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2020/zb/07/zb_cdhd_20.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  15. Bahk, J., Yun, S.C., Kim, Y.M., & Khang, Y.H. (2015). Impact of unintended pregnancy on maternal mental health: a causal analysis using follow up data of the Panel Study on Korean Children (PSKC). BMC pregnancy and childbirth15, 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0505-4
  16. Campbell, A.A. & Mosher, W.D. (2000). A history of the measurement of unintended pregnancies and births. Matern Child Health Journal,4(3),163-169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009519329226
  17. Compernolle, E.L. (2017). Disentangling Perceived Norms: Predictors of Unintended Pregnancy During the Transition to Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(4), 1076–1095. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26646131
  18. Finer, L.B., & Henshaw, S.K. (2006). Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.38.090.06
  19. Finer, L.B., & Zolna, M.R. (2016). Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011. The New England journal of medicine, 374(9), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
  20. Klerman L.V. (2000). The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition. Maternal and child health journal, 4(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009534612388
  21. Part, K., Moreau, C., Donati, S., Gissler, M., Fronteira, I., & Karro, H. (2013). Teenage pregnancies in the European Union in the context of legislation and youth sexual and reproductive health services. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 92(12), 1395-1406 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12253
  22. Radu, M.C., Dumitrescu, A.I., Zaharia, C., Boeru, C., Pop-Tudose, M.E., Iancu, C.F., & Chivu, R.D. (2021). Teenage Pregnancies and Childbirth Experience in Romania From the Midwives Point of View. Cureus13(3), e1385 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13851
  23. Rastad, Z., Golmohammadian, M., Jalali, A., Kaboudi, B., & Kaboudi, M. (2021). The effect of positive psychology intervention on quality of life among women with unintended pregnancy. Journal of education and health promotion, 10(1), 165. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_784_20
  24. Rochebrochard, E., & Joshi, H. (2013) Children Born After Unplanned Pregnancies and Cognitive Development at 3 Years: Social Differentials in the United Kingdom Millennium Cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(6), 910–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt063
  25. 42% of births in the EU are outside marriage. (2020, 17 July). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20200717-1

Published

2024-01-31