THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF THE PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP INFLUENCE ON THE ADOLESCENT RESILIENCE FORMATION

Abstract

The article focuses on the problem of resilience formation as a predictor of effective adaptation of Ukrainian adolescents to life under martial law. Based on the application of theoretical analysis and generalization of scientific sources, the content of the category of resilience, its leading features and functions are revealed. The concept of resilience is interpreted as the ability of an individual to withstand threats and recover quickly. It is emphasized that resilience as a systemic personal quality is formed due to the integrated action of internal (individual psychological) and external (social) factors. The content, structure and manifestations of parent-child relationships as a factor in the formation of resilience in adolescence are presented. The importance of parent-child relationships as a leading factor in the formation of resilience in adolescence is proved. The author’s structural and functional model of the parent-child relationship influence on the formation of adolescent resilience is presented, and the model content is analyzed. The content of value-motivational, cognitive-reflexive, emotional-regulatory and conative-behavioral components of parent-child relationships is revealed and their synergistic interaction is emphasized. The functions of parental influence on the formation of the child’s resilience are singled out and differentiated, namely: educational (information, explanation for the formation of the ideological value of resilience; facilitation) (enrichment and stimulation of the child’s resilience that the individual trajectory of upbringing in combination with significant individual psychophysiological factors of adolescent formation (temperament properties, character traits, content of self-acceptance) lead to the formation of resilience as an actual personal trait of a teenage child.

References

1. Goleman, D. (2020). Emotsiinyi intelekt [Emotional intelligence]. Kharkiv : Vivat [in Ukrainian].
2. Korchikova, I.V. (2014). Osobystisna avtonomiia yak chynnyk vyznachennia zhyttievoi perspektyvy v yunatskomu vitsi [Personal autonomy as a factor in determining life prospects in adolescence]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://enpuir.npu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/5177 [in Ukrainian].
3. Kochubey, T., & Semenov, A. (2013). Naukovi pidkhody do vyvchennia emotsiinoi stiikosti yak osobystisnoi liderskoi yakosti [Scientific approaches to the study of emotional stability as a personal leadership quality]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Umanskoho pedahohichnoho
   universytetu – Collection of scientific works of Uman Pedagogical University, 1, 117–124. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/znpudpu_2013_1_17 [in Ukrainian].
4. Lushyn, P.V. (2013). Ekolohychnaia pomoshch lychnosty v perekhodnyi peryod: ekofasylytatsyia [Ecological help of the person in a transition period: eco-facilitation]. Kyiv [in Russian].
5. Muzyka, O.L. (2017). Tsinnisna determinatsiia stanovlennia obdarovanoi osobystosti) [Value determination of gifted personality formation]. Kyiv : Vydavnychyi Dim «Slovo». Retrieved from https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/708203/1/Muzyka_O_L_ZDSOO_IP_2017.pdf [in Ukrainian].
6. Radchuk, H.K. (2011). Psykholohiia aksiogenezu osobystosti u konteksti vyshchoi profesiinoi osvity [Psychology of axiogenesis of personality in the context of higher professional education]. Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
7. Savchenko, O.V. (2012). Analiz kohnityvnykh struktur, shcho obumovliuiut spryiniattia ta otsinku riznykh sytuatsii [Analysis of cognitive structures that determine the perception and evaluation of different situations]. Naukovi zapysky. Seriia «Psykholohiia i pedahohika». «Aktualni problemy kohnityvnoi psykholohii» – Scientific notes. Series “Psychology and Pedagogy”. “Actual problems of cognitive psychology”, 20, 244–253. Retrieved from https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/709101/1/%D0%A1%D0%B5%D1%
   80%D0%B4%D1%8E%D0%BA%20%D0%9B_%D0%A8.pdf [in Ukrainian].
8. Serdiuk, L. Z., &Shamych, O. M. (2017). Samodeterminatsiia osobystosti yak psykholohichna osnova yii samorealizatsii [Self-determination of personality as a psychological basis of its self-realization. Current problems of psychology]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Instytutu psykholohii imeni H.S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology. Collection of scientific works. G. S. Kostyuk Institute of Psychology, NAPS of Ukraine, T. VI, Vol.13, 164–173. [in Ukrainian].
9. Sopivnyk, I.V. (2016). Tsinnisnyi (aksiolohichnyi) pidkhid u vykhovanni osobystosti. [Value (axiological) approach in the education of personality]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy. Pedahohika, psykholohiia, filosofiia. –Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Pedagogy, psychology, philosophy, 239, 225–229 [in Ukrainian].
10. Cicchetti, D., & Valentino, K. (2006). An ecological transactional perspective on child maltreatment: Failure of the average expectable environment and its influence upon child development. In D. Cicchetti & D.J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 129–201). New York : John Wiley.
11. Eccles, J.S., Early, D., Fraser, K., Belansky, E., & McCarthy, K. (1997). The relation of connection, regulation, and support for autonomy to adolescents’ Journal of Adolescent Research, 12(2), 263–286.
12. Harter, S. (2006). Developmental perspectives on the self. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.) Handbook of Child Psychology, (Vol. 4, pp. 513–519). New York : Wiley.
13. Lebedynets-Roda, O. (2020). The Conceptual and Terminological Field for the Problem of Adolescents’ Excessive Involvement into Social Networking. Psychological Journal, 6(9), 15–28.
14. Masten, A. (2014). Ordinary magic: resiliencein development. New York : The Gulfordpress. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21625
15. Masten, A.S., Best, K.M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2(4), 425–444.
16. Mattanah, J.F., Lopez, F.G., & Govern, J.M. (2011). The contributions of parental attachment bonds to college student development and adjustment: a meta-analytic review. Couns. Psychol., 58, 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024635
17. Rogers, C.R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
18. Rutter, M. (1999). Resilience concept and finding: Implications for family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 21, 119–144.
19. Skrove,  M., Romundstad, P., & Indredavik, M.S. (2013). Resilience, lifestyleand symptoms of anxiety and depression  in adolescence:  the  Young-HUNTstudy. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol, 48, 407–416.
20. Werner, E.E. (2000). Protective factors and individual resilience. In P. Shonkoff & S.J. Meisels (Eds.). Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention (pp. 115–132). New York : Cambridge University Press.
21. Yates, T.M. , & Masten, A.S. (2004). Fostering the future: resilience theory and the practice of positive psychology. In A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.). Positive Psychology in Practice (pp. 521–539). New York : Wiley.