PSYCHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF INTERSUBJECTIVE INTERACTION IN ADOLESCENCE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31392/NPU-nc.series12.2022.17(62).06

Keywords:

interaction, adolescence, activity, subject, intersubjectivity, personality.

Abstract

The article considers different aspects of intersubjective interaction as collective activity that is oriented on subjective qualities of participants, the sensitive period for which is adolescence. It is shown that such elements as openness, trustfulness, intimate-personal communication emerge between young people. Adolescence is the period when a person usually experiences such special feelings as first love and friendship. On the other hand, in adolescence communication with older and younger individuals gains its own particularities and realities too. It is argued that intersubjective interaction in adolescence is communication and joint activity. It is noted that adolescence is sensitive for the formation of intersubjective interaction because various aspects of this age period prepare a person for an interaction that would be mutually developing and facilitate the development of participants’ subjectivity. It is underlined that a social situation of development in adolescence assumes intersubjective interaction as a component of critical importance, which provides specific senses and meanings for various aspects of young peoples’ everyday life. The affective core of adolescence, namely experiencing the future, comes into question and becomes central in intersubjective interaction. Existential and meaning-seeking issues often make a substantial contribution to both content and structure of intersubjective interaction in adolescence. Adolescence is analyzed as a special period of rapid formation of a person’s subjectivity when a young man or woman engages with their peer partners as a responsible, active, creative, initiative personality. The aim of such engagement is both to reveal one’s own subjectivity and help to disclose the partners’ subjectivity. It is important, however, that position “I want to be the subject and help you reveal your subjectivity” influences dialogic cooperation and mutually developing communication. The conclusion is drawn that adolescence is the special period when intersubjective interaction acquires specific traits and develops for the sake of subjectivity formation of all participants within processes of joint activity and communication.

References

  1. Abramova, G. (1999). Vozrastnaja psihologija [Developmental Psychology]. Ekaterinburg : Delovaja kniga [in Russian].
  2. Bantisheva, O.O. (2017). Psihologіchnі osoblivostі emocіjnogo іntelektu osіb junackogo vіku, shilnih do vіktimnoji povedіnki [The Psychological Peculiarities of Emotional Intelligence of Adolescents, Inclined to Victim Behavior]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  3. Bozhovich, L.I. (2009). Lichnost i ejo formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its Formation in Childhood]. Saint Petersburg : Piter [in Russian].
  4. Bulah, І.S. (2004a). Psihologіchnі osnovi osobistіsnogo zrostannja pіdlіtkіv [The Psychological Fundamentals of Teenagers’ Personal Growth]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  5. Bulah, І.S. (2004b). Psihologіchnі osnovi osobistіsnogo zrostannja pіdlіtkіv [The Psychological Fundamentals of Teenagers’ Personal Growth]. Extended abstract of Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  6. Vygotskij, L.S. (1983). Istorija razvitija vysshih psihicheskih funkcij [The History of Development of Higher Mental Functions]. Sobranie sochinenij Collected Works, ( 3). Moscow : Pedagogika [in Russian].
  7. Grіnova, O.M. (2018). Psihologіja proektuvannja zhittievogo shljahu osobistіstju junackogo vіku [The Psychology of Life Path Planning of Personality in Adolescence]. Doctor’s thesis. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
  8. Kuzіkova, S.B. (2012). Subjektnіst u kontekstі samorozvitku osobistostі [Subjectivity in the context of personal development]. Vіsnik Harkіvskogo nacіonalnogo unіversitetu. Serіja PsihologіjaBulletin of Kharkiv National University. “Psychology” Series, 1009, 40–44 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Leontev, D.A., Mandrikova, E.Ju., Osin, E.N., Plotnikova, A.V., & Rasskazova, E.I. (2005). Vozmozhnosti jempiricheskogo issledovanija lichnostnogo potenciala [The Possibilities of Empiric Study of Personal Potential]. Prikladnaja psihologija kak resurs socialno-jekonomicheskogo razvitija sovremennoj Rossii. Materialy mezhregionalnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferenciiApplied Psychology as a Resource of Social-economic Development of Contemporary Russia. The Works of Interregional Scientific and Practical Conference, 259–260 [in Russian].
  10. Litvinchuk, A.І. (2019). Psihologіchnі chinniki rozvitku ekologіchnoji samosvіdomostі u junackomu vіcі [The Psychological Factors of the Development of Ecological Consciousness in Adolescence]. Candidate’s thesis. Zhitomir [in Ukrainian].
  11. Luchkіv, V.Z. (2017). Psihologіchnі osoblivostі rozvitku asertivnostі v junackomu vіcі [The Psychological Peculiarities of Assertiveness Development in Adolescence]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv, Zhitomir [in Ukrainian].
  12. Maksimenko, S.D., Maksimenko, K.S., & Papucha, M.V. (2007). Psihologіja osobistostі [Personality Psychology]. Kyiv : Vidavnictvo TOV «KMM» [in Ukrainian].
  13. Papucha, M.V. (2001). Psihologіja rannoji junostі [Psychology of Early Adolescence]. Nіzhin : Redakcіjno-vidavnichij vіddіl NDPU [in Ukrainian].
  14. Sergejenkova, O., Stoljarchuk, O., Kohanova, O., & Paseka, O. (2012). Vіkova psihologіja [Developmental Psychology]. Kyiv : Centr uchbovoji lіteraturi [in Ukrainian].
  15. Stavicka, S.O. (2014). Teoretichnij analіz problemi mehanіzmіv rozvitku duhovnoji samosvіdomostі osobistostі v junackomu vіcі [The Theoretical Analysis of the Problem of Development of Spiritual Selfconsciousness Mechanisms in Adolescence]. Problemi suchasnoji psihologіji : Zbіrnik naukovih prac Kamjanec-Podіlskogo nacіonalnogo unіversitetu іmenі Іvana Ogіenka, Іnstitutu psihologіji іmenіS. Kostjuka NAPN UkrajiniThe Problems of Contemporary Psychology: The Collection of Articles of Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ogienko National University and G.S. Kostyuk Institute of Psychology of National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 24, 630–645 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Tatenko, V.O. (2014). Socіalna і polіtichna psihologіja Jevromajdanu: sub’jektne і vchinkove [Social and Political Psychology of Euromaidan]. Psihologіchnі nauki: problemi і zdobutki – Psychological Sciences: Problems and Achievements. Retrieved from http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJR
    N&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Pnpz_2014_5_13.pdf
    [in Ukrainian].
  17. Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskah smysla [A Man Seeking Sense]. Moscow : Progress [in Russian].
  18. Chudnovskij, V.Je. (2006). Stanovlenie lichnosti i problema smysla zhizni: Izbrannye Trudy [Personality Development and the Problem of Life Sense. Selected Works]. Moscow, Voronezh : Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo psihologo-socialnogo instituta; Izdatelstvo NPO «MODJeK» [in Russian].
  19. Chudnovskij, V.Je. (2009). Vstupitelnoe slovo. L.I. Bozhovich: chelovek, lichnost, uchenyj [Introductory Address. L.I. Bozhovich: person, personality, researcher]. In: Bozhovich L.I. Lichnost i ejo formirovanie v detskom vozraste [Personality and its Formation in Childhood]. с. 9–32. Saint Petersburg : Piter [in Russian].
  20. Jerikson, Je. (1996). Identichnost: junost i krizis [The Identity: Adolescence and the Crisis]. Moscow : Izdatelskaja gruppa «Progress» [in Russian].
  21. Crosnoe, R., & Johnson, M. (2011). Research on Adolescence in the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review Of Sociology, 37(1), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150008
  22. Hoggan, C., Mälkki, K., & Finnegan, F. (2016). Developing the Theory of Perspective Transformation; Continuity, Intersubjectivity, and Emancipatory Praxis. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 48–64. doi: 10.1177/0741713616674076
  23. Sawyer, S., Azzopardi, P., Wickremarathne, D., & Patton, G. (2018). The age of adolescence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, Published Online January 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1

Published

2022-04-29