FEATURES OF INTERCONNECTION OF PERSONALITY DEFENSE MECHANISMS AND ADAPTATION POTENTIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31392/UDU-nc.series12.2023.22(67).04Keywords:
defense mechanisms, psychological defense, adaptation, adaptability, adaptation potential.Abstract
The article reveals the results of an empirical study of the interrelationship between defense mechanisms and the adaptation potential as a complex integrative feature of personality. Based on a theoretical analysis of the problem under study, it is assumed that defense mechanisms contribute to the restoration of internal balance in an individual’s interactions and the external environment, performing a regulatory function within the adaptation potential. The study employed both theoretical methods (analysis and synthesis of theoretical and empirical research) and empirical methods (testing focused on diagnosing the intensity of defense mechanism and the level of components of the adaptation potential), as well as the methods of mathematical statistics (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient). It has been found that defense mechanisms are interconnected with various aspects of an individual’s adaptation potential. The correlation analysis indicates a pro-adaptive orientation of the denial mechanism (statistically significant associations with assertiveness and stress resilience), as well as intellectualization (positive correlation with conscientiousness and self-effectiveness). The maladaptive nature of reactive formation is reflected in its positive association with the neuroticism factor, as well as inverse associations with stress resilience and agreeableness. The adaptive potential of such defense mechanisms as regression and compensation has an ambivalent nature: regression, on the one hand, exhibits an inverse relationship with assertiveness and stress resilience and a direct relationship with the neuroticism factor. On the other hand, it shows positive associations with the factors of extraversion, agreeableness, and openness to experience. Compensation is directly linked with extraversion, neuroticism, and agreeableness, but also has an inverse association with the overall adaptability score. It is established that defense mechanisms are interconnected with various components of the adaptation potential, exhibiting both adaptive and maladaptive orientations. The results obtained can be applied for the creation of developmental and corrective programs aimed at enhancing an individual’s level of adaptability while minimizing the use of maladaptive psychological defense mechanisms.
References
1. Блажівський, М.І. (2014). Поняття адаптації у сучасній науковій літературі. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ. Серія «психологічна», 1, 234–242.
2. Галецька, І.І. (2005). Психологічні чинники соціальної адаптації. Соціогуманітарні проблеми людини, 1, 91–100.
3. Кирпенко, Т.М., & Бохонкова, Ю.О. (2017). Механізми психологічного самозахисту підлітків. (Монографія). Сєвєродонецьк : СНУ ім. В. Даля.
4. Саннікова, О.П., Санніков, О.І., & Подоляк Н.М. (2013). Діагностика асертивності: результати апробації методики «ТОКАС». Наука і освіта, 3, 140–144. Режим доступу: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/NiO_2013_3_42
5. Школіна, Н.В., Шаповал, І.І., Орлова І.В., Кедик, І.О., & Станіславчук, М.А. (2020). Адаптація та валідизація україномовної версії шкали стресостійкості Коннора-Девідсона 10 (CD-RISC-10): апробація у хворих на анкілозивний спондиліт. Український Ревматологічний Журнал, 2(80), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.32471/rheumatology.2707- 6970.80.15236
6. Cramer, Ph. (2015). Understanding Defense Mechanisms. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 43(4), 523–552. https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2015.43.4.523
7. Grebot, E., Paty, B., & Girard Dephanix, N. (2006). Styles défensifs et stratégies d’ajustement ou coping en situation stressante. L’Encéphale, 32(3) P.1, 325–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013- 7006(06)76158-9
8. Haan, N. (1982). The Assessment of Coping, Defense, and Stress. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of Stress. Theoretical and Clinical Aspects (pp. 254-269). London : Collier Macmillan Publishers
9. Kramer, U. (2010). Coping and defense mechanisms: What's the difference? - Second act. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 83, 207–221. https://doi:10.1348/147608309X475989
10. Martin, A.J., Nejad, H., Colmar, S., & Liem, G.A.D. (2012). Adaptability: Conceptual and empirical perspectives on responses to change, novelty and uncertainty. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22, 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.8
11. McWiliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: understanding personality structure in the clinical process. 2-nd ed. New York : The Guilford Press.
12. Nicolas, M., & Jebrane, A. (2008). Relationships between Coping Strategies and Defense Mechanisms in Sport Performance. Psychological Reports, 103(3), 735–744. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.103.3.735-744
13. Roccas, S., Lilach Sagiv, L., Schwartz Shalom, H., & Knafo, A. (2002). The Big Five Personality Factors and Personal Values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(6), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289008
14. Sannikova, O., & Kuznetsova, O. (2018). Adaptaptivity as the integral phenomenon: empirical verification. Science and Education, Issue 3, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-3- 4
15. Vaillant G. (1972). Adaptation to life: How the best and the brightest came of age. Boston : Little Brown.
16. Waldeck, D., Pancani, L., Holliman, A., Karekla, M., & Tyndall, I. (2021). Adaptability and psychological flexibility: Overlapping constructs? Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 72–78.
17. White, R.W. (1974). Strategies of adaptation: An attempt at systematic description. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.). Coping and Adaptation. (pp. 47-68). New York : Basic Books.
