COGNITIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS OF GIFTEDNESS DEVELOPMENT IN STUDENTS OF ECONOMICS

Authors

Keywords:

giftedness, motivational factors, cognitive factors, students, economic education

Abstract

The article highlights the study of pedagogical approaches to the development of cognitive and motivational factors of giftedness in students of economic specialties in the context of the transformation of the current system of higher education. It is emphasized that the effective formation of giftedness is impossible without the creation of an educational environment that ensures not only the mastering of professional knowledge, but also the development of internal motivation, self-reflection and the ability to self-study. It is determined that pedagogical influence should be implemented through the integration of cognitive and motivational components of the educational process aimed at forming an active position of the student. The main stages of pedagogical work on the development of motivational factors are outlined: the formation of the primary stimulus, activation of search activity, awareness of individual educational goals, consolidation of a positive attitude towards professional self-improvement. Emphasis is placed on the importance of using interactive forms of learning that contribute to the development of analytical, critical, creative thinking, as well as the formation of communication and research skills. The conceptual provisions of the model of intellectual enrichment are described, which involves the individualization of educational tasks, the autonomy of the student in the choice of learning methods, and the creation of an atmosphere of support, trust, and intellectual initiative. Giftedness is defined as an integral property that combines cognitive and motivational components, the interaction of which ensures the professional success of the future specialist. It was concluded that the teacher's task is to create a developmental educational space where cognitive development and motivational growth of students mutually reinforce each other, forming a competitive, creative and socially responsible economist of the new generation. The prospect of further research is seen in the study of the relationship between the cognitive thinking styles of students and the level of manifestation of their academic and professional giftedness.

Author Biographies

  • Kulakov Ruslan, Rivne State University of Humanities

    Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of the  Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology

    http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0033-8784

     

  • Vasheniuk Anton, Rivne State University of Humanities

    Postgraduate Student of the Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology

    http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8617-3688

     

References

1. Антонова, О.Є. (2019). Технології розвитку обдарованості особистості. Житомир : Вид-во ЖДУ ім. І. Франка.

2. Гайворонська, І.В., & Сергєєва Є.О. (2025). Формування внутрішньої мотивації здобувачів економіко-управлінських спеціальностей. Сталий розвиток економіки, 3(54), 374-380. https://doi.org/10.32782/2308-1988/2025-54-57

3. Зеліковська, О.О. (2012). Мотивація студентів економічних спеціальностей до формування міжкультурної компетенції. Педагогічний дискурс, 11, 98-101. Режим доступу: https://www.academia.edu/129383773/Мотивація_студентів_економічних_спеціальностей_до_формування_міжкультурної_компетенції

4. Касіянц, С. (2015). Шляхи мотивації майбутніх економістів до організації самоосвітньої діяльності. Молодий вчений, 2(17), 147-150. Режим доступу: https://www.aphn-journal.in.ua/archive/12_2015/40.pdf

5. Мельник, М.Ю., & Бєльська, Н.А. (2023). Рейтингові шкали оцінки проявів обдарованості. Київ : Інститут обдарованої дитини НАПН України. Режим доступу: https://iod.gov.ua/content/docs/documentspdf/199/rei-tingovi-shkali-ocinki-proyaviv-obdarovanosti–metodichni-rekomendacii-_.pdf

6. Романова, О.О., & Мудрик, О.В. (2018). Технологія роботи з обдарованими студентами шляхом використання інтерактивних методів навчання. Педагогіка формування творчої особистості у вищій і загальноосвітній школах, 61(2), 172-175. Режим доступу: http://pedagogy-journal.kpu.zp.ua/archive/2018/61/part_2/35.pdf

7. Asensio, D., Fernández-Mera A., & Duñabeitia J.A. (2023). The cognitive profile of intellectual giftedness. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17583/ijep.11828

8. Berková, K., Borůvková, J., & Lízalová L. (2019). Motivation of students of economic and technical fields as a tool of competitiveness of universities and colleges: empirical study. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(4), 72-77. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110401

9. McClain, M.-C., & Pfeiffer, S.I. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: a look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 59-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2012.643757

10. Pezzuti, L., Farese, M., Dawe, J., & Lauriola, M. (2022). The cognitive profile of gifted children compared to those of their parents: a descriptive study using the Wechsler scales. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4), 91. Режим доступу: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9680488/

11. Renzulli, J.S., & Reis, S.M. (2014). The schoolwide enrichment model: a how-to guide for talent development. (4th ed). New York : Prufrock Press/Routledge.

12. Vaivre-Douret, L. (2011). Developmental and cognitive characteristics of “high-level potentialities” (highly gifted) children. International Journal of Pediatrics, Article 420297. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/420297

Published

2025-10-31